Azərbaycanca
Беларускі
Dansk
Deutsch
Española
Français
Indonesia
Italiana
日本語
Қазақ
Lietuvos
Nederlands
Português
Русский
සිංහල
แบบไทย
Türkçe
Українська
中國人
United State
Afrikaans
Пиррон (б. з. б. 360— 270 ж. ш.) — ежелгі Грекия философы, скептицизмнің () негізін салушы.
Пирронның өзі ештеңе жазбаған, оның көзқарасы шәкірттері Флиунттық Тимонның, Евсевийдің жазбалары бойынша белгілі. Евсевий, Тимонның негізгі үш сауалын мазмұндап береді: заттардың табиғаты қандай, олармен қандай қатынас жасауымыз керек, бұл қатынастардан біз не табамыз?
- Бірінші сауалға Пиррон мен Тимон былай деп жауап берді: ешбір зат жайында ештеңе білмейміз.
- Екіншісіне — не жөнінде болмасын біздің пікіріміз таза субъективі айғақ қана болатындықтан, пікір айтудан аулақ болуымыз керек;
- Үшіншісіне — айналадағының барлығына (естілік, атаракция) толық рухани тәуелсіздікпен қарау керек дейді. Пирронизмнің ізбасары Энесидем, ал аяқтаушы Секст Эмпирик болды.
Сілтемелер
- Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
- Annas, Julia and Barnes, Jonathan, The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
- Bett, Richard, "Aristocles on Timon on Pyrrho: The Text, Its Logic and its Credibility" Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12, (1994): 137-181.
- Bett, Richard, "What did Pyrrho Think about the Nature of the Divine and the Good?" Phronesis 39, (1994): 303-337.
- Bett, Richard, Pyrrho, His Antecedents, and His Legacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Brunschwig, Jacques, "Introduction: the Beginnings of Hellenistic Epistemology" in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld and Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, 229-259.
- Burnyeat, Myles (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.
- Burnyeat, Myles and Frede, Michael (eds.), The Original Sceptics: A Controversy, Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.
- Doomen, Jasper, "The Problems of Scepticism" Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 10 (2007): 36-52.
- Hankinson, R.J., The Sceptics, London: Routledge, 1995.
- Long, A.A., Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics, University of California Press, 1986.
- Long, A.A. and Sedley, David, The Hellenistic Philosophers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
- Striker, Gisela, "On the difference between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics" in G. Striker, Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 135-149.
- Striker, Gisela, "Sceptical strategies" in G. Striker, Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 92-115.
- Striker, Gisela, "The Ten Tropes of Aenesidemus" in G. Striker, Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, 116-134.
- Svavarsson, Svavar Hrafn, "Pyrrho’s dogmatic nature", The Classical Quarterly, 52 (2002): 248-56.
- Svavarsson, Svavar Hrafn, "Pyrrho’s undecidable nature", Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 27 (2004): 249-295.
Дереккөздер
- Diogenes' testimony is doubtful. See Bett (2000) 1.
- Long and Sedley (1987) vol. 1, pp. 14-17, vol. 2, pp. 5-7.
уикипедия, wiki, кітап, кітаптар, кітапхана, мақала, оқу, жүктеу, тегін, тегін жүктеу, mp3, видео, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, сурет, музыка, ән, фильм, кітап, ойын, ойындар, ұялы, андроид, iOS, apple, ұялы телефон, samsung, iphone, xiomi, xiaomi, redmi, honor, oppo, nokia, sonya, mi, ДК, веб, компьютер
Pirron b z b 360 270 zh sh ezhelgi Grekiya filosofy skepticizmnin negizin salushy Pirronnyn ozi eshtene zhazbagan onyn kozkarasy shәkirtteri Fliunttyk Timonnyn Evsevijdin zhazbalary bojynsha belgili Evsevij Timonnyn negizgi үsh saualyn mazmundap beredi zattardyn tabigaty kandaj olarmen kandaj katynas zhasauymyz kerek bul katynastardan biz ne tabamyz Birinshi saualga Pirron men Timon bylaj dep zhauap berdi eshbir zat zhajynda eshtene bilmejmiz Ekinshisine ne zhoninde bolmasyn bizdin pikirimiz taza subektivi ajgak kana bolatyndyktan pikir ajtudan aulak boluymyz kerek Үshinshisine ajnaladagynyn barlygyna estilik atarakciya tolyk ruhani tәuelsizdikpen karau kerek dejdi Pirronizmnin izbasary Enesidem al ayaktaushy Sekst Empirik boldy SiltemelerAlgra K Barnes J Mansfeld J and Schofield M eds The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1999 Annas Julia and Barnes Jonathan The Modes of Scepticism Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1985 Bett Richard Aristocles on Timon on Pyrrho The Text Its Logic and its Credibility Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 12 1994 137 181 Bett Richard What did Pyrrho Think about the Nature of the Divine and the Good Phronesis 39 1994 303 337 Bett Richard Pyrrho His Antecedents and His Legacy Oxford Oxford University Press 2000 Brunschwig Jacques Introduction the Beginnings of Hellenistic Epistemology in Algra Barnes Mansfeld and Schofield eds The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1999 229 259 Burnyeat Myles ed The Skeptical Tradition Berkeley University of California Press 1983 Burnyeat Myles and Frede Michael eds The Original Sceptics A Controversy Indianapolis Hackett 1997 Doomen Jasper The Problems of Scepticism Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 10 2007 36 52 Hankinson R J The Sceptics London Routledge 1995 Long A A Hellenistic Philosophy Stoics Epicureans Sceptics University of California Press 1986 Long A A and Sedley David The Hellenistic Philosophers Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1987 Striker Gisela On the difference between the Pyrrhonists and the Academics in G Striker Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1996 135 149 Striker Gisela Sceptical strategies in G Striker Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1996 92 115 Striker Gisela The Ten Tropes of Aenesidemus in G Striker Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics Cambridge Cambridge University Press 1996 116 134 Svavarsson Svavar Hrafn Pyrrho s dogmatic nature The Classical Quarterly 52 2002 248 56 Svavarsson Svavar Hrafn Pyrrho s undecidable nature Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 27 2004 249 295 DerekkozderDiogenes testimony is doubtful See Bett 2000 1 Long and Sedley 1987 vol 1 pp 14 17 vol 2 pp 5 7